Randall Radic Takes On Commissioned Work. More

 

Please Visit Our Sponsors

WORKOUT DVDS

Natural Health

Try Health News for more interesting natural health news.

PARTNERS & FRIENDS

 

logo_blue.gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pluck

McClatchy-Tribune News

Google News

 

 


Inform


DeepBlog

 

Health Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory


In compliance with the FTC, consumers should be aware that Basil & Spice reviewers occasionally receive books/products free of charge for reviewing purposes only from publishers, agents, and authors.  They are not compensated fiancially in any way.

Google Ad Privacy

 

banner
Powered by Squarespace
JUST PUBLISHED!!
READ US EVERYWHERE
Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

                     BASIL & SPICE OPINION!

              

Tuesday
09Feb2010

Michael Pollan On Food Rules (Feb 2010)

Jill Nussinow--

The other day I went to see my former schoolmate, Michael Pollan, speak about his new book Food Rules. I find this ironic because in junior high and high school, I was the one who cared about healthy food, eschewing the garbage served in the cafeteria and bringing my own food to eat. I went on to get a graduate degree in nutrition and I think that Michael got a degree in English, Michael Pollancommunication or journalism. Michael Pollan became a famous writer. I became a writer with much less status but still with something to say.
Michael (also referred to as Pollan) will tell you that he’s not an authority on food. And this is the part that bothers me just a bit. For more than twenty years, I have been teaching people about eating healthier by eating “real” foods. I’d also tell them that they didn’t need a Registered Dietitian to tell them that the foods at the top of the Food Pyramid – cake, cookies, soda, ice cream, salad dressing and the like- weren’t good for them. Obviously, I was correct – they needed a journalist/writer to do that.
Michael’s new book Food Rules (Penguin Books/ 2009) follows the format of his previous book, In Defense of Food, going with his haiku, “Eat Food. Not Too Much. Mostly Plants.” This is where we come into agreement. In fact, one of the first statements I heard at the talk (I took 9 pages of notes in just over 30 minutes) was, “The healthiest food is in the produce department.” We agree that eating vegetables is an essential part of eating well.
I will now briefly run through some of the rest of my notes that might be of interest to you.  Michael and I agree on much more than just vegetables and cooking. In fact, we encourage people to follow many of the same food rules.
For a little background, Pollan shared that his interest in food grew out of his garden trials and tribulations. He was pleased to be at The Seed Bank and noted that the "real economy" is in the seeds, and that you cannot bail out the "real economy." In fact, we need to grow it. I agree wholeheartedly.
Pollan wonders why Americans are so confused about feeding themselves. And then when he takes a trip to the supermarket, he understands. There are lots of "food like substances" and far less "real food."
He suggests avoiding food that has health claims. He says that the cereal boxes contain the most flagrant examples of misleading claims, such as cereal that improves your immunity, that will improve your child's focus, that will protect you from a heart attack, yet this cereal contains 43% sugar by weight, and so on. And did you know that Froot Loops are better for you than donuts (as if donuts were the gold standard)?
Pollan adds that the yogurt aisle isn't much better.
He reminded the audience that food is not biochemistry. You do not need to know what an antioxidant is to eat well. AMEN. I couldn't agree more. You do not need a dietitian to tell you that potato chips are not healthy food. But please, Michael, I beg you to accept the fact that some dietitians are into food and what it can do, and RDs are not the enemy.
Here are the myths that Pollan wants to rebuke:
  1. Foods are the sum of their nutrient parts. Nutrients matter.
  2. You need experts to tell you how to eat. He likens this process to religion - and discusses the relationship of food and health.
  3. Nutritionism divides foods into good and evil nutrients which has led us to where we are now in terms of the obesity epidemic.
  4. The whole point of eating is health. Food and eating are on the ruining your health or saving your life spectrum. But what about other perfectly legitimate reasons for eating such as pleasure, community, cultural identity?

Pollan said, "I don't think that science knows enough to tell us what to eat." Agreed -- nutrition science is young. That's why I prefer to follow Mother Nature's need. He likens where we are to surgery in the year 1650 -- "it's interesting to watch but you don't want them to work on you yet," he says.

He suggests that if we tune into nature more and look at our past, we can likely figure out a better way to eat.

People who eat an incredible range of traditional diets around the world do not suffer from the chronic modern diseases such as obesity, heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, that are rampant in the US population who eat the SAD (Standard American Diet) of mostly processed food.

And we can roll back the effects of the SAD diet by changing how you eat.

Here are some of the 64 rules in Food Rules that Pollan shared. Remember:

Eat Food. Not too much. Mostly Plants.

Avoid foods that make health claims, need a package and a big marketing budget.

The healthiest food is in the produce section. AT this point in the talk, I am smiling wide and patting myself on the back (at least figuratively). He said, "Don't be fooled by the silence of the yams, that they won't contribute to your health."

Don't buy any foods that you see advertised on television. (Big marketing budget at work.)

If it came from a plant, eat it. Woo hoo. Now I am internally cheering.

If it grew in a plant or a laboratory, avoid it. (Please say no to Monsanto as they destroy our food system.)

Rule Number 63: Plant a garden. Make it a large vegetable garden if you have the space, or a window box garden if you don't have room. Get away from fast, cheap and easy food. You'll eat what your garden yields. And you'll save money.(Oh, yes.) A recent study showed that a $70 investment in a garden yields about $700 worth of food. And it will put you in touch with the earth.

Rule Number 64: COOK. It's the easiest way to take back control of your diet and to know where your food comes from. (At this point, I was floating, and thinking that this talk was too good to be true except it could have been me up there wowing the crowd.)

While I wish that it were me or some other Registered Dietitian, with the ability to see beyond nutrients and look at food for the goodness that it provides, doing the bidding and getting people interested in their food, I salute Michael Pollan for all that he’s done to help people wake people up to the state of our food and what we eat. I hope that all that he's doing will make a big difference. It already has for me.

Jill Nussinow, aka The Veggie Queen™, is a culinary educator, cookbook author and Registered Dietitian whose goal is to get consumers to eat more vegetables as the way to deliciously improve their health. She is the author of The Veggie Queen: Vegetables Get the Royal Treatment and is featured in the DVD Pressure Cooking: A Fresh Look, Delicious Dishes in Minutes.

Coconut Gets The Yum Factor

American Dietetic Association Hosts Dr. Michael Roizen

Copyright © 2006-2010, Basil & Spice. All rights reserved.

 

 

Tuesday
09Feb2010

ATTN MEN--What Women Do NOT Want For Valentine’s 2010

By Kelly Jad'on

There are different varieties of love, but you men seem to dwell heavily on Eros, the special type of love between a man and a woman that celebrates a physical union.   Eros is known as the Greek mythological figure for sexual love and beauty.  His Roman counterpart is known as Amor or Cupid.  You’ll recognize his wings, bow, and arrows together as a symbol of romantic love on Valentine’s Day.

Christian lore cites a priest known as Valentine who refused to recognize the Emperor’s law requiring young men in the military to remain single. (Under Roman Emperor Claudius II) Secretly, Valentine performed marriage ceremonies for these young men and their brides.  Subsequently, the priest was arrested, placed in jail and later put to death--a high price for marrying those in love.  Prior to his execution, it is said that he wrote the first “valentine”—addressing it to a young woman he called “beloved.”  It is thought that she was the jailer’s daughter.  The note read, “From Your Valentine.”

So guys, whether you’re the GQ or a devoted home-at-night sort of guy—this blog’s for you.  Valentine’s Day is your 24-hour opportunity to show that special woman what she really means to you.  Don’t blow this once-a-year chance! 

This means of course, turning off Cops and tuning in to the opposite sex.

Do you know what her favorite music is? Do you expect kinky sex in return for a box of junky chocolates?  Do you like not know what your wife’s favorite flower is?

Here are a few hints from female readers recently polled about what they’d rather NOT receive for Valentine’s Day:

*Forget the waxy store bought chocolates, my own are much better, or give me a taste or two of some rich dark chocolate, but not enough to hurt my waist.

*No lingerie.  What does he want?  More sex?

*A perfume I don’t like.  Why doesn’t he know what I wear by now?

*A product manufactured by child labor in a foreign country.

*A dieting book.  Doesn’t that just say, “You’re so fat!”

Whether you’re rich or not, money is not always a woman’s priority.  You can still give your sweetheart the love she needs on Valentine's and all year long.  How?

  • Respect her.  Listen when she is talking.
  • Believe in her and her abilities.
  • Tell her that she’s beautiful every day.
  • Acknowledge her needs as an individual by giving her time for herself.
  • Explore what she enjoys doing—even if you don’t like it.
  • Prepare a special dinner on Valentine’s Day. (Make it something other than a sandwich and canned soup.)
  • Flowers are nice, if you can afford them.
  • Create a special piece of art, write a poem, or dance with your love.
  • Light a candle.

Say, “I love you.”

Valentine's 2010: Scent Has A Language All Its Own

Copyright © 2006-2010, Basil & Spice. All rights reserved.

Monday
08Feb2010

3*Movie Review: Dear John (Feb 2010)

 

3* Review By James R. Holland

This reviewer saw this feature in a movie theater with only two other people, both female, in the audience. There was not a peep out of either of them at any time in the entire film. With no audience reaction to note, this review is based entirely on how this reviewer feels about the movie. Audience reaction does cause reviewers to consider that aspect of the experience when doing a review.

This is a one-tissue story. There were several other attempts to increase the Kleenex rating, but they didn’t quite work. Admittedly this motion picture fan prefers escapism to reality at the movies. I have more than enough stress and hardship in my everyday existence than to want to experience more at the movie theater. I’ve always gone to the movies to be entertained, escape reality for a brief time and maybe for educational purposes. However, over the years the educational benefits coming out of Hollywood have proven more than a bit suspect. The movies have tended to be more than a little influenced by various left-wing liberal agendas, but that wasn’t the case with this particular feature film. This film’s educational slant focused mostly on coin collecting and understanding Autism. 

Dear John is the film version of the novel by Nicholas Sparks. It’s a love story between John Tyree, a young Special Forces army soldier played by Channing Tatum, and an idealistic college student Savannah Curtis who is played by Amanda Seyfried. They meet at a beach in Charlestown, S.C. during the two-week period when John is home on leave and Savannah is on a summer break. In addition to spending her time at her family’s beach house and attending the usual number of beach activities, she is also helping to build a new house for a family whose home was washed away by a hurricane.

It’s a story of love at first sight.  They agree to remain true to each other until his tour is over in twelve months and she graduates from college. They also agree to write each other constantly so that they can share each other’s experiences and not grow apart because of the separation. So this John is actually getting a “Dear John” letter every day from his sweetheart back home. Naturally, the best laid hopes and plans of youth are soon altered by the uncontrollable forces of reality. The events of 9-11 set in motion a series of adventures that neither member of the young couple can really control. The story is about two average everyday people. It’s about their motivations and why they make the life decisions they do. Autism is a sub-team in the movie. Relationships get complicated and the cast gets enveloped in them whether they wish to or not? Richard Jenkins did a good job as John’s father, Mr. Tyree. The understated roles are always harder to make believable.

Since this is a contemporary film with American locales, this reviewer found himself wondering about several annoying little things throughout the movie. Why was Savannah so, so pale when she was spending everyday at the beach or out in the sun building a house with the charity group Habitat for Humanity? Why did she appear to need a manicure, perhaps because of the hard physical construction work she was doing although that didn’t seem to be problem? Why was everyone driving the brand new automobiles or trucks they were?

And the location of the small house being constructed seemed like a very upscale location—the kind of real estate where homeowners would have flood and homeowner’s insurance and assets with which to rebuild their own homes? These kinds of distractions don’t help the audience enjoy the story. It means the dialogue isn’t keeping the viewers' minds totally involved. I’d heard this was a “chick flick” but that description probably doesn’t really sum up this PG-13 motion picture because it’s more than that, but it definitely didn’t appeal to me and I don’t think many of my male friends or sons would be interested in seeing it either. Give me entertainment every time. I don’t want to have to pay for a ticket in order to feel anybody else’s pain if I don’t have to. 

James R. Holland is a film editor, producer, and author--most recently of Adventure Photographer (A Bit of Boston Books/ 2009).  He reviews movies exclusively for Basil & Spice.  Visit James R. Holland's Writer's Page.

 4* Movie Review: Edge Of Darkness--Welcome Back Mel! (Jan 2010)

Copyright © 2006-2010, Basil & Spice. All rights reserved.

 

Monday
08Feb2010

HBO MOVIE REVIEW: Temple Grandin (Feb 2010)

Reviewed by David M. Kinchen

Brilliant Portrayal of Autistic Genius Who Revolutionized Humane Treatment of Livestock

Claire Danes is wonderful in the Mick Jackson helmed HBO movie Temple Grandin, about an autistic woman whose empathy with animals led her to develop equipment and techniques for ethical  treatment of livestock. Grandin is well known for her work in autism advocacy and for developing the hug machine, designed to calm hypersensitive persons.

Danes (My So-Called Life, Brokedown Palace, Shopgirl) plays Grandin, born in 1947 in Boston, who was diagnosed at any early age with autism. Rather than institutionalizing her daughter, Temple's mom, Eustacia,  performed brilliantly by British actress Julia Ormond, decided to reject the traditional practices governing the treatment of autism and saw her daughter through boarding school, college and graduate school.

Much of the movie was filmed in Texas, lending authenticity to the scenes where Grandin developed a  system of cattle dipping that is among the humane livestock treatment practices used by more than half the feed lots in North America.

After graduating from Hampshire Country School,  a boarding school for gifted children in Rindge, NH in the 1960s, Grandin went on to college. She received her bachelor's degree in psychology from Franklin Pierce College in Rindge, NH  in 1970, her master's degree in animal science from Arizona State University in 1975 and  her Ph.D. in animal science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign  in 1989. She is a professor of animal science at Colorado State University.

The movie toggles back and forth between scenes at an Arizona ranch with her aunt Ann, played by the very versatile Catherine O'Hara, and scenes from Temple's early years, as she and her mother struggle with mainstreaming education. Temple Grandin speaks in a staccato fashion, captured with warmth and understanding by Danes, whom I consider to be an absolutely brilliant performer.

Dealing with humans is often difficult for young Temple, but she immediately connects with cattle and horses. Temple's high-achieving autism consists of her visualizing in pictures and diagrams, which screenwriters Christopher Monger and William Merritt Johnson -- along with director Jackson (The Bodyguard, Live from Baghdad) -- bring to the screen to help us understand how Temple Grandin sees the world.

Grandin was featured in a collection of essays by British neurologist Dr. Oliver Sacks in his An Anthropologist on Mars (1995). The title of the book derives from the essay of the same name featuring Sacks' interaction with Grandin and comes from a phrase Grandin uses to describe how she often feels in social interactions.

The cast also features David Strathairn as Professor Carlock, who quickly grasps the genius behind Temple Grandin's autism. Strathairn never phones in a performance and he's wonderful as an understanding teacher.

On Monday, Feb. 8, the American Humane Association and the Federation of Animal Science Societies (FASS)  praised Temple Grandin which first aired Saturday, Feb. 6.  Dr. Grandin is widely recognized within the animal welfare and livestock-handling industries as a pioneer in the ethical treatment of animals, the two organizations said in a news release.

Review: Animals In Translation By Temple Grandin (Feb 2010)

Copyright © 2006-2010, Basil & Spice. All rights reserved.

Monday
08Feb2010

Valentine's 2010: Are You A Tommy Girl?

By Randall Radic

The poet Paul Valery asserted that a woman who does not use perfume has no future.  This is because perfume is the keeper of memory.  And a woman without a past has no future. 

Alexander the Great’s body smelled naturally of musk, which consequently made him very popular with women.  And it has been reported that the mad monk Rasputin exuded a powerful yet pleasing odor.  This scent was responsible for his magnetism.  In a sense, then, he was simply irresistible.

But that was then and this is now.  Now there are so many perfumes to choose from.  Some are sweet nothings, reminiscent of a small sad bar of motel soap.  A few, though, are like a beautiful woman, whose beauty camouflages other qualities – her more abstract virtues.   Two of today’s most spectacular perfumes are Tommy Girl and White Linen.       

Calice Becker concocted Tommy Girl, whose infrastructure is that of tea.  After trying 1100 blends, Tommy Girl emerged.  A radiant scent that shimmers like Prokofiev’s First Symphony.   It’s what is known as a floral perfume.  And once it is applied, a point of pure white emanates forth, providing its host with verve.  She who wears it stridently asserts her vitality to all entering her realm. 

Tommy Girl is quintessentially American – brash and young.  Therefore it suits young women or mature women who have not abandoned themselves to vain regrets or lost causes. 

Catching a whiff of Tommy Girl is like falling into heaven, which is clean and white and bright.  It gives life meaning.  Which explains why Tommy Girl is one of the top fifteen fragrances ever.

At the other end of the spectrum is Black, by Bulgari.  It’s an oriental scent.  Complex, sometimes inscrutable, Black changes color like a chameleon.  As the wearer’s mood alternates – from dreamy to capricious – Black seesaws right along.  This means Black is more than a beautiful fragrance.  It’s fascinating, because it’s full of impish intelligence.

Annick Menardo created Black.  She made it three-dimensional, imbuing it with a pinch of sweetness, a hint of floral bouquet, and then she ramped in the pungency of fresh rubber.  In effect, it’s as if she managed to put Wagner’s Ring Cycle in a bottle.  Spritz it on and theme underscores theme underscores theme.  Black moves to the emotion of the wearer. 

Black is designed for women whose temperaments are not subtle, who make no pretense of stoic resignation.  In other words, Black is a vivacious instrument of expression.  Above all, Black dislikes boredom.

The choice is yours.  Tommy Girl or Black.  You can’t go wrong with either one.  Both will make you alluring and enchanting.

Randall Radic is a former Old Catholic priest.  He is a graduate of the University of Arizona.  He holds a Master of Theology,  from Trinity Seminary, a Doctorate of Theology from Trinity Seminary,Th.D., and a Doctorate of Sacred Theology, S.T.D. from Agape Seminary.

After a midlife crisis, he spent time behind bars. Today, he has emerged a changed man.  He is the author of Gone To Hell: True Crimes of America’s Clergy (ECW Press/ Oct 2009), and A Priest in Hell: Gangs, Murderers and Snitching in a California Jail. Radic writes the 2012 EXPOSED series exclusively for Basil & Spice. Visit his Writer's Page.

Valentine's 2010: Scent Has A Language All Its Own

Valentine's 2010: How To Bring Back Your Sex Drive

Copyright © 2006-2010, Basil & Spice. All rights reserved.