Randall Radic Takes On Commissioned Work. More

 

Please Visit Our Sponsors

WORKOUT DVDS

Natural Health

Try Health News for more interesting natural health news.

PARTNERS & FRIENDS

 

logo_blue.gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pluck

McClatchy-Tribune News

Google News

 

 


Inform


DeepBlog

 

Health Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory


In compliance with the FTC, consumers should be aware that Basil & Spice reviewers occasionally receive books/products free of charge for reviewing purposes only from publishers, agents, and authors.  They are not compensated fiancially in any way.

Google Ad Privacy

 

banner
Powered by Squarespace
JUST PUBLISHED!!
READ US EVERYWHERE
Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz
« Kansas City Barefoot Running In 30F! Cold On The Feet! | Main | Ultra Runner Incorporates Vibrams For Marathon »
Monday
16Nov2009

2010 Boston Marathon Entrance Closes Earlier--11/13/2009 Why?

 

Dane Rauschenberg--

The title of this post should have a question mark at the end as I have not fully decided if there really is a need or not.  However, one thing is certain: one must be quick on the registration trigger to be one of the 20,000+ runners traversing the storied road from Hopkinton to Boston.

When I first qualified for Boston in 2005, it was the middle of January.  Hoping to get a slightly better time, I waited another until the middle of March when I lowered my time to a 3:07 at the Little Rock Marathon.  I immediately came home and registered.  However, even though that was just five weeks before Boston that year, I don't think I was the last one in.

That is not the case anymore.

In 2008, I was just about the last one registered as I waited for a career change and a move across the country to get settled in before I finally submitted my registration.  As I was planning a Boston double that day (running the real marathon and then heading back out to the start to do it again with the race director, Dave McGillivray) I had a few things that needed to be planned in order to do so.  That planning almost kept me from registering which chocked me as it was only near the beginning of February and I had almost missed my window.  Fortunately, I had a wonderful day.

Not too many chaps make me look short.  Thanks, Chris!


For this year's Boston, registration closed even earlier. Sometime in mid-January the gates closed and hundreds of runners who were shooting for a late January race as their final BQ were shut out.

Now, on November 13th, 2009, Boston closed its doors for the 2010 race, a full two months faster than it ever had before. What exactly is going on?

There is no doubting that the average times for marathon finishers has gotten decidedly slower in the past 20 years. In 1980 the average marathon time was about three and a half hours for men and about four hours for women. Today, the averages are 4:16 for men and 4:43 for women.  This increase in the average time is obviously because so many more marathoners are simply out there running marathons.  However, this rise in marathon runners (first timers and multiple marathoners) has been steadily increasing for over a decade. Why has Boston been filling up so fast in just the past four or five years?

Boston has always been a destination marathons.  A goal race.  When the numbers were getting too "large" a few decades ago, time limits were placed to try and stem the tide of runners.  It had the opposite effect as runners now wanted to be part of an exclusive club and numbers soared.

Over time the qualifying standards have gotten a little softer to where they are now presently. So, have they gotten so soft that the race can close almost as soon as it opens when just a few years ago it took months and months to hit that plateau? If so, should the qualifying standards be changed?  Should they reflect the changing times and be made more challenging?

A great deal of work and thought have gone into the current standards. Revisions have been proposed often and in many differing ways including age-graded tables created by the World Masters Association (WMA), which use world-record times and "age factors" to calculate "equivalent" times for all race distances for every age between 8 and 100.  Regardless, it seems the time has come that something should be done.

If Boston is to remain the race that we all aspire to participate in as runners, shouldn't it be a little more difficult to get into then it currently is?  Perhaps, after all the talk of the death of American long-distance running because of "walk-runners" and charity runners, Americans are once again getting faster.  We have seen the rise of Ryan Hall and Dathan Ritzenhein (and to a lesser extent Brian Sell, which is in no way meant to put Sell down) who, while not having won any major races outright, have become good enough that they have to be entered into serious discussions as potential winners.

And maybe the rest of America is following suit. The numbers, especially the most recent ones involving the quick filling of the Boston marathon, seem to be pointing that way. If that is the case, why not make it just that much more difficult to make it to the place where it all starts?

 

Dane Rauschenberg is an extreme runner, speaker and author. His seminars and speeches are known not only as powerful, passionate and engaging but above everything else, encouraging. His first book, See Dane Run has been a surprise breakout hit for both runners of all speeds and those outside the world of running. It empowers people to set goals for themselves and use their passion and strength to reach those goals. Dane Rauschenberg currently lives in Salt Lake City. He runs and designs marathons around his speaking schedule. His book, See Dane Run, is currently available at www.seedanerun.com

Book Review: See Dane Run By Dane Rauschenberg

Dane Rauschenberg, Extreme Runner, On Purpose Of A Marathon

Copyright © 2006-2010, Basil & Spice. All rights reserved.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (13)

Dane: It seems to me that Boston is filling faster for 2 reasons:

1 - the BAA now accepts BQs earned up to 18 months prior to Patriot's Day.

2 - the BAA accepts softer BQs. ie: the qualifying time is based upon the runner's age on Patriot's Day -- not on the date of the BQ performance itself. That fact alone awards many runners an extra 10- or 15-minute cushion.
November 16, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterHopkinton
One thing I wonder about is how many sponsor's waivers are issued each year. Every year runners are entered without having to qualify, and that surely fills spaces also. I have no idea how many runners those are.
November 17, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDenise
Denise: The answer to your question can be found in an excerpt from a 2009 Runner's World article about the Boston Marathon written by Amby Burfoot:

**
"We work very hard to make sure the total of all nonqualified runners doesn't exceed 20 percent of the field," BAA's Jack Fleming.

If that percentage were extended to the full Boston field, it would mean that 5,000 or more of this year's Boston runners got accepted with official numbers but without a qualifying time.
**
November 17, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterHopkinton
My goal is to run all the World Marathon Majors. After BQing in Chicago, Boston was to be my fourth. I'm so upset, I was careless and didn't register, I mistakenly thought I had more time. I had it on my planner to register Wed, but registration closed Sat or Sun. Damn!
November 17, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterJJMidtown
I can't help but feel a little resentful at the 5,000 (or more?) runners who will be running next year without qualifying. Those 5,000 spots represent 5,000 runners who, like me, worked their butts off to qualify (which I did one day after they closed registration), but now are left out in the cold.
November 18, 2009 | Unregistered Commenteretta
Hoping to requalify (I ran Boston from '01 to '04) in Philadelphia this weekend, I was both shocked and disappointed to learn the race had closed. For many of us who live in the mid-Atlantic area, Philly's the best shot to run a BQ. And I feel bad for the Philly organizers, who specifically market the race as one of the faster courses for runners looking to met their time.

I understand the value of waived runners in Boston...I met many in Hopkinton during my prior runs and they're all great people. But 20 percent of the field is too many, especially for a race like Boston.

Also, while the 18-month window is nice, perhaps it needs to be modified so that while you may have 18 months from the time of qualifying, once you use that it's done...no more doubling-up from one BQ.

Either way, hopefully I'll run my time in Philly and be there in 2011.
November 19, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDerek
Either lift the qualifying all together or prohibit charity/waiver runners or hold two races.
November 19, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterAndy Jenks
"lift the qualifying all together"

At Boston? What on earth for?
November 19, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterHopkinton
Having both together waters down the event so removing the qualifying aspect would mitigate that issue. But that aside a two race solution with one being Boston Marathon and the other being a Boston Charity run works for me.
November 19, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterAndy Jenks
How do the charity runners water down the event? They're placed in second wave start corrals.
November 19, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterHopkinton
Interesting alternative:

runningtimes.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=18335
December 13, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterMichael
I was also closed out as I ran my BQ in Huntsville, AL in December. I was very disappointed, as I wanted to run with many friends again in 2010. As an old-timer, I take issue with the folk who think we should be able to qualify with the youngsters. When I was in my 40's, I qualified with under 3:10. At 70, there is no way that I could, or that anyone could do the same. And yet, we train and race with as much effort as we did years ago. I have also run charity marathons, and was pleased to do so. And, while I am grateful for the opportunity to be able to run Boston again, I am resentful of the fact that I could not in 2010, partly because of the charity runners and loss of exclusivity to qualifiers.
January 6, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterGordon
I was lucky (maybe even smart) enough to register early and get accepted to Boston this year. My recommendation for anyone who qualifies is to register immediately and not worry about losing the entry fee if you decide not to run it. Your qualifying time will still be good when the following Boston marathon takes place and you can enter the first day registration opens.

On a separate note, I do agree that 5,000 or more charity runners is more than enough. I realize they are running for great causes (just as I have in the past), but Boston needs to be preserved for the runners who earn their way on the course.
January 20, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterGerry

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.